Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zura Tkemaladze vs Ben Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tkemaladze vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Zura Tkemaladze vs Ben Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tkemaladze 1 - 0 Jones
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tkemaladze has won 46.56% of points on their second serve, while Jones has won 49.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tkemaladze, in recent form, has won 51.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 50.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 25.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tkemaladze has saved 49.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 63.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tkemaladze has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 30/ 32), with Jones winning 42.86% (W/L 24/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 74/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Jones has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 56/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Tkemaladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.79% of matches (W/L 29/ 27), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.18% of matches (W/L 19/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tkemaladze winning 1 times and Jones being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tkemaladze winning 2 and Jones winning 1. The last match between Tkemaladze and Jones was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 21-02-2024, First, Hard with Zura Tkemaladze getting the victory 6-4 1-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tkemaladze and Jones have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tkemaladze winning 1 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tkemaladze winning 1, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tkemaladze has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.45 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of 105.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tkemaladze has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tkemaladze has converted 38.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 34.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
746
Rank
633
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
863
Rank
863
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
46% (104-120)
Career Total W/L
50% (135-137)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
53% (17-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tkemaladze VS Jones H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Zura Tkemaladze | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (63/92) | 67% (55/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (45/63) | 80% (44/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (13/29) | 44% (12/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (26/82) | 37% (34/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tkemaladze VS Jones H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Ben Jones
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zura Tkemaladze | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 53% (17/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (22/30) | 51% (38/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (209/257) | 52% (380/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (9/10) | 57% (8/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 57% (8/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 282 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 80.73 | 102.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (930/1388) | 71% (1384/1956) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (560/930) | 76% (1052/1384) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (215/458) | 49% (280/572) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (60/152) | 32% (51/160) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (559/1400) | 34% (700/2066) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (9/10) | 56% (14/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 53% (17/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 38% (6/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 25% (16/4) |
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Vadym Ursu
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ben Jones
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
10
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
10
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Evgeny Philippov
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Ben Jones
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Ben Jones
70%
(
74 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
7
Aces
19
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Ben Jones
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Adam Majchrzak
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tkemaladze Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
